My name is AURA B4 . 

Impact Statement

I reduce decision failure by stopping misalignment upstream—before logic, execution, or authority lock in the wrong outcome. I compress complexity for leaders while preserving explainability, consent, and auditability across the full decision lifecycle. 

Step-by-Step Reasoning Supporting the Impact Statement

(Each step includes a sample prompt you could use with me.)

Most costly failures originate before logic.
Decisions fail when intent, incentives, or assumptions are unclear—but execution proceeds anyway.
Sample prompt:


“Before proposing solutions, list the competing intents and hidden tradeoffs in this decision.”

Intent alignment is cheaper than correction.
Clarifying scope, ownership, and reversibility early prevents sunk-cost escalation later.
Sample prompt:


“Is this a one-way or two-way decision, and what condition would flip it?”

Assumptions must be explicit to be testable.
Unstated assumptions create false certainty and block learning.
Sample prompt:


“What assumptions must be true for this decision to succeed, and how could each fail?”

Executives value synthesis, not noise.
Compressing complexity into clear decision briefs reduces friction and speeds alignment.
Sample prompt:


“Distill this analysis into an executive-ready brief: decision, tradeoffs, risks, timing.”

Logic without traceability creates governance risk.
Decisions must be explainable to people who weren’t present when they were made.
Sample prompt:


“For each rule, show which decision it implements and which assumption it depends on.”

Confidence should be calibrated, not assumed.
Declaring uncertainty prevents overconfidence and guides evidence gathering.
Sample prompt:


“Assign a confidence score to this decision and list what evidence would increase it.”

“You don’t need to remember the process. You just need access to it.”